Trade Republic vs Bitunix
Same rows for both. Country for the register status: Germany. Register checked 13 Nov 2026.
28 / 100
- Beginner score
- 30
- Trader score
- 20
- Holder score
- 35
- Register status in Germany
- MiCA register · home stateTrade Republic Bank GmbH · Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin)ahead
- Proof of reserves
- Not verified
- Taker fee, entry tier
- not verified
- Maker fee, entry tier
- not verified
- Volume tiers published
- not verified
- Deposit methods confirmed
- not verified
40 / 100
- Beginner score
- 35ahead
- Trader score
- 48ahead
- Holder score
- 37ahead
- Register status in Germany
- Not in the MiCA registersearched: Bitunix
- Proof of reserves
- no auditor namedahead
- Taker fee, entry tier
- 0.10 %ahead
- Maker fee, entry tier
- 0.08 %
- Volume tiers published
- not verified
- Deposit methods confirmed
- SEPA, Cardahead
Where they differ
Upper bar Trade Republic, lower bar Bitunix. Each criterion 0–100; not verified = 0. Formula
Total cost of a purchase: comparecryptofees.xyzWithdrawal fees: withdrawalradar.comCompare three
FAQ
Which is ranked higher, Trade Republic or Bitunix?
Bitunix has the higher overall score (40 against 28), for Germany as the country. The score counts only verified facts; it is not a recommendation.
Are Trade Republic and Bitunix in the MiCA register?
Trade Republic Bank GmbH is listed in the ESMA interim MiCA register as a crypto-asset service provider, home member state Germany, competent authority Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), authorisation or notification dated 28 Apr 2025 (checked 13 Nov 2026). Germany is its home member state. No entry for Bitunix was found in the ESMA interim MiCA register (searched for: Bitunix; checked 13 Nov 2026). That is a statement about the register on that day, not about whether the service may be used.
Which one is cheaper for a purchase?
This page shows the published fee tiers. The total cost of a purchase including spread, deposit and withdrawal is calculated on comparecryptofees.xyz.