OKX vs Bitunix
Same rows for both. Country for the register status: Germany. Register checked 13 Nov 2026.
60 / 100
- Beginner score
- 50ahead
- Trader score
- 59ahead
- Holder score
- 71ahead
- Register status in Germany
- MiCA register · passportedOKX Europe Limited · Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA)ahead
- Proof of reserves
- Monthly · no auditor namedahead
- Taker fee, entry tier
- 0.35 %
- Maker fee, entry tier
- 0.20 %
- Volume tiers published
- not verified
- Deposit methods confirmed
- not verified
40 / 100
- Beginner score
- 35
- Trader score
- 48
- Holder score
- 37
- Register status in Germany
- Not in the MiCA registersearched: Bitunix
- Proof of reserves
- no auditor named
- Taker fee, entry tier
- 0.10 %ahead
- Maker fee, entry tier
- 0.08 %
- Volume tiers published
- not verified
- Deposit methods confirmed
- SEPA, Cardahead
Where they differ
Upper bar OKX, lower bar Bitunix. Each criterion 0–100; not verified = 0. Formula
Total cost of a purchase: comparecryptofees.xyzWithdrawal fees: withdrawalradar.comCompare three
FAQ
Which is ranked higher, OKX or Bitunix?
OKX has the higher overall score (60 against 40), for Germany as the country. The score counts only verified facts; it is not a recommendation.
Are OKX and Bitunix in the MiCA register?
OKX Europe Limited is listed in the ESMA interim MiCA register as a crypto-asset service provider, home member state Malta, competent authority Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA), authorisation or notification dated 27 Jan 2025 (checked 13 Nov 2026). Germany is named among the member states in which it provides services. No entry for Bitunix was found in the ESMA interim MiCA register (searched for: Bitunix; checked 13 Nov 2026). That is a statement about the register on that day, not about whether the service may be used.
Which one is cheaper for a purchase?
This page shows the published fee tiers. The total cost of a purchase including spread, deposit and withdrawal is calculated on comparecryptofees.xyz.