Bybit vs Bitunix
Same rows for both. Country for the register status: Germany. Register checked 13 Nov 2026.
71 / 100
- Beginner score
- 62ahead
- Trader score
- 69ahead
- Holder score
- 82ahead
- Register status in Germany
- MiCA register · passportedBybit EU GmbH · Austrian Financial Market Authority (FMA)ahead
- Proof of reserves
- Hacken · report 23 Sept 2026ahead
- Taker fee, entry tier
- 0.20 %
- Maker fee, entry tier
- not verified
- Volume tiers published
- not verified
- Deposit methods confirmed
- SEPA
40 / 100
- Beginner score
- 35
- Trader score
- 48
- Holder score
- 37
- Register status in Germany
- Not in the MiCA registersearched: Bitunix
- Proof of reserves
- no auditor named
- Taker fee, entry tier
- 0.10 %ahead
- Maker fee, entry tier
- 0.08 %
- Volume tiers published
- not verified
- Deposit methods confirmed
- SEPA, Cardahead
Where they differ
Upper bar Bybit, lower bar Bitunix. Each criterion 0–100; not verified = 0. Formula
Total cost of a purchase: comparecryptofees.xyzWithdrawal fees: withdrawalradar.comCompare three
FAQ
Which is ranked higher, Bybit or Bitunix?
Bybit has the higher overall score (71 against 40), for Germany as the country. The score counts only verified facts; it is not a recommendation.
Are Bybit and Bitunix in the MiCA register?
Bybit EU GmbH is listed in the ESMA interim MiCA register as a crypto-asset service provider, home member state Austria, competent authority Austrian Financial Market Authority (FMA), authorisation or notification dated 28 May 2025 (checked 13 Nov 2026). Germany is named among the member states in which it provides services. No entry for Bitunix was found in the ESMA interim MiCA register (searched for: Bitunix; checked 13 Nov 2026). That is a statement about the register on that day, not about whether the service may be used.
Which one is cheaper for a purchase?
This page shows the published fee tiers. The total cost of a purchase including spread, deposit and withdrawal is calculated on comparecryptofees.xyz.